Scientists Say New Government Climate Report Twists Their Work

A recent Department of Energy (DOE) report challenges the mainstream scientific consensus on climate change, claiming that CO2-induced warming is less economically damaging than commonly believed and that aggressive mitigation efforts might cause more harm than good. However, nine scientists from various disciplines criticized the report for misrepresenting their work through cherry-picked data, misinterpretations, and omission of relevant context. The report’s authors, four scientists and one economist known for contrarian views on climate science, were recently hired by the DOE, raising concerns among mainstream researchers about the report’s credibility and motivations. The release of the DOE report coincided with the Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) announcement to seek a rollback of the 2009 endangerment finding, which underpins the agency’s authority to regulate greenhouse gases. The EPA cited the DOE report as part of its scientific review to challenge this foundational ruling. DOE Secretary Chris Wright and EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin framed the report as an effort to restore “common sense” and rational