Articles tagged with "fossil-fuels"
Big Oil Has A Plan - Waste As Much Energy As Possible - CleanTechnica
The article discusses recent actions by the U.S. government, specifically the elimination and de-prioritization of the Energy Star program by the EPA under the Trump administration. Energy Star, a bipartisan initiative started by Republicans, has been highly effective in saving consumers money—$14 billion in 2024 alone—and significantly reducing carbon emissions since 1992. The program’s termination is seen as a deliberate move to slow the transition to renewable energy and prolong fossil fuel dependence, benefiting incumbent energy producers like Big Oil. Environmentalist Bill McKibben highlights that such policies appear designed to waste energy, aligning with fossil fuel industry interests that historically favor energy inefficiency to maintain market dominance. The article also contrasts this approach with the preferences of businesses globally, where 97% reportedly favor switching to renewable energy due to its efficiency, cost stability, and reduced geopolitical risks. McKibben criticizes the U.S. government’s contradictory stance, citing a Department of Energy goal to increase fossil fuel exports and foreign
energyfossil-fuelsrenewable-energyEnergy-Star-programemissions-reductionenergy-policyclimate-changeThe EPA, Power Plants And Planetary Boundaries - Everything Is Connected - CleanTechnica
The article discusses the recent announcement by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) to repeal all greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions standards for fossil fuel-fired power plants, effectively eliminating regulations established under previous administrations, notably those of Barack Obama and Joe Biden. The EPA’s justification centers on the claim that carbon dioxide emissions from thermal power plants have decreased from about 5.5% of global emissions in 2005 to approximately 3% today, arguing that further reductions would have minimal impact on public health. The proposal includes repealing emission guidelines for existing fossil fuel steam units and carbon capture and sequestration (CCS) standards for coal-fired plants and new turbines, signaling a significant rollback of environmental protections. Supporters of the rollback, including EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin, former President Donald Trump, and industry representatives like the National Mining Association and West Virginia Governor Patrick Morrisey, praise the move as a boost to coal power, energy dominance, and economic development. They emphasize the importance of
energyEPApower-plantsgreenhouse-gas-emissionsfossil-fuelscarbon-captureenvironmental-policyA No Kings Day Demand For Climate Action And Democracy Protections - CleanTechnica
The article emphasizes the importance of standing up for social safety programs and democratic protections on No Kings Day, highlighting critical programs such as Supplemental Nutrition Assistance, Medicare, Medicaid, the Affordable Care Act, and veterans' services. It stresses the need to defend immigrants' rights and the right to peaceful assembly while calling for urgent climate action. The article critiques former President Donald Trump’s policies, arguing they undermine the U.S.’s ability to combat climate change, damage international alliances like the Paris Agreement, and threaten democratic principles by concentrating power in a manner reminiscent of monarchy. The piece explains that the Founding Fathers designed the U.S. government as a republic with checks and balances to prevent tyranny, contrasting this with the autocratic tendencies seen in Trump’s leadership. It notes that the climate crisis is a unique challenge that spans both present and future generations, requiring consistent, long-term policies rather than erratic measures like the “TACO” (Trump Always Chickens Out) tariff approach. The article calls for strong,
energyclimate-changeenvironmental-policyrenewable-energysustainabilityclimate-actionfossil-fuelsAlberta's Renewable Energy Sabotage: Time For Federal Intervention - CleanTechnica
The article highlights Alberta’s newly introduced reclamation security requirements for renewable energy projects, set to take effect by May 31, 2025, which are described as unprecedentedly severe and punitive. Developers must post securities equal to 30% of anticipated decommissioning costs at project start, increasing to 60% after 15 years, with these rules applied retroactively to existing projects by 2027. The exclusion of salvage value from these calculations inflates financial burdens well beyond international norms, making Alberta’s requirements the highest globally. This regulatory shift contrasts sharply with Alberta’s historically lax reclamation policies for fossil fuel industries, which have accumulated tens of billions in unfunded cleanup liabilities with minimal upfront financial assurances, effectively shifting cleanup costs to taxpayers. The article argues that this move represents a politically motivated, ideologically driven attack on the renewable energy sector, undermining investor confidence by breaking contractual norms through retroactive application of harsh financial obligations. Such instability threatens to halt billions in investments and push companies to relocate
energyrenewable-energyAlbertaenergy-policyenvironmental-regulationfossil-fuelsinvestment-risksThe EPA Wants to Roll Back Emissions Controls on Power Plants
The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has proposed rolling back emissions standards for power plants, which are the second-largest source of CO2 emissions in the country. This move comes shortly after NOAA reported record-high seasonal CO2 concentrations. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin criticized previous administrations for prioritizing environmental regulations over economic growth, emphasizing the agency’s intention to support domestic fossil fuel industries, including coal, which has been in decline due to competition from natural gas and renewables. The proposed rollbacks would weaken Biden-era rules that required coal- and gas-fired power plants to reduce emissions by 90% by the early 2030s, primarily through carbon capture and storage technology. The EPA’s justification for the rollbacks includes the argument that US power sector emissions represent a small fraction (3%) of global emissions, and that continued coal use abroad diminishes the impact of US regulations on global greenhouse gas levels. However, critics highlight that the US power sector remains a major domestic polluter, ranking second only
energyEPApower-plantsemissionscarbon-capturefossil-fuelsclimate-policy3 Ridiculous Things About Donald Trump Forcing A Coal Power Plant To Stay Open - CleanTechnica
The article by Steve Hanley criticizes the Trump administration, specifically the Department of Energy led by a fossil fuel billionaire, for forcing a Michigan utility company to keep an outdated and polluting coal power plant operational despite having a newer natural gas plant built to replace it. This mandate is described as absurd and counterproductive, especially given the administration’s contradictory stance on climate change: denying global warming publicly while invoking emergency powers due to expected extreme heat to justify keeping the coal plant running. Hanley highlights this as a hypocritical and environmentally harmful approach that exacerbates global heating rather than addressing it responsibly. Additionally, the article points out the irony of a Republican-led government, which typically advocates for limited government intervention, imposing a heavy-handed federal order that disrupts market efficiency and forces Consumers Energy to maintain an uneconomical power source. This intervention leads to higher electricity costs for ratepayers across Michigan and 14 other states, with no prior consultation from state regulators or grid operators. The author condemns this as unnecessary government overreach that increases financial burdens on consumers while undermining clean energy progress, labeling the policy as “brilliant idiocy” for its counterproductive and costly consequences.
energycoal-power-plantfossil-fuelselectricity-gridenergy-policyclimate-changeutility-costsEnergy Department Orders Michigan Coal Generating Station To Remain Open - CleanTechnica
The U.S. Energy Department, led by Chris Wright, issued an emergency order mandating that the 63-year-old J.H. Campbell coal-fired power plant in Michigan remain operational for at least 90 days, overriding a previously approved decommissioning plan set by the Michigan Public Service Commission (PSC) in 2022. The plant was scheduled to close as part of a transition plan that included replacing its capacity with a methane-fired power plant already purchased by Consumers Energy, the utility owner. Wright justified the order by citing concerns over potential electricity shortages in the Midwest during the summer due to insufficient baseload power from coal, gas, and nuclear plants. However, the Michigan PSC and the utility company stated they neither requested nor were consulted about the emergency order, highlighting a lack of coordination and transparency. The decision has drawn criticism for bypassing the usual regulatory process, which typically involves public comment and agency review, and for imposing significant financial burdens on consumers. Dan Scripps, chair of the Michigan PSC, estimated that keeping the coal plant running could cost ratepayers across 15 states tens of millions of dollars, potentially nearing $100 million. The Energy Department defended the order by referencing longstanding warnings from grid operators about the risks of decommissioning baseload power sources but did not provide evidence of a cost-benefit analysis or acknowledge the existing replacement plan. Emergency orders of this nature are described as highly unusual, underscoring the controversial and unprecedented nature of this intervention.
energycoal-powerenergy-policypower-gridelectricity-generationfossil-fuelsenergy-departmentOur Problem Politically: We No Longer Focus On The Greater Good - CleanTechnica
The article from CleanTechnica argues that a fundamental political problem in the US today is the lack of focus on the greater good, with society and government failing to provide appropriate oversight to address collective challenges like climate change. The author highlights the irony of insurance companies refusing to cover homes at climate risk while insuring fossil fuel projects, underscoring a broader societal failure to prioritize long-term communal welfare over short-term individual or corporate gain. The erosion of trust and effectiveness in government further hampers efforts to regulate and transition away from fossil fuels, as government itself has become a divisive and often distrusted institution. The piece reflects on how political discourse has shifted from collective action and shared sacrifice—seen in historical movements like WWII, Civil Rights, and women’s suffrage—to a more selfish, fear-driven narrative focused on personal gain, scapegoating, and division. The author laments that today’s politics rarely start from the question, “How do we help society as a whole?” Instead, the prevailing mindset is “What’s in it for me?” This shift toward individualism and greed has weakened societal cohesion and the ability to address pressing issues like climate collapse effectively. The article calls for a renewed emphasis on common ground and the greater good as the foundation for political and social progress.
energyfossil-fuelsclimate-changegovernment-policysustainabilityenvironmental-oversightclean-energyInsurance Companies Cancelling Home Owner Insurance Are Supporting LNG Terminals - CleanTechnica
The article highlights a stark contradiction in the behavior of major insurance companies in the United States. While these insurers are increasingly canceling homeowner insurance policies in many areas due to climate-related risks, they continue to provide coverage for liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminals, particularly in regions like the Gulf Coast from Port Arthur, Texas, to Lake Charles, Louisiana. These areas, predominantly inhabited by Black, Brown, and low-income communities, have become "sacrifice zones"—highly polluted and environmentally degraded regions where marginalized populations disproportionately suffer health and environmental harms. The insurance companies, motivated by substantial profits from LNG projects, are criticized for ignoring the ethical implications of supporting fossil fuel infrastructure that exacerbates climate change and environmental racism. The article draws on data from the Rainforest Action Network, which identifies insurers such as Chubb, AIG, Allianz, Liberty Mutual, Munich Re, Swiss Re, Zurich, Tokio Marine, and The Hartford as key backers of LNG projects like Cameron LNG. Additionally, major financial institutions including JPMorgan, Citi, BlackRock, and Vanguard have funded these fossil fuel expansions. Community organizers and activists, such as Roishetta Ozane from Lake Charles, emphasize the direct health impacts on local residents and link these to broader climate crises driven by fossil fuel emissions. They argue that while insurance companies refuse to cover vulnerable homeowners facing climate threats, they paradoxically insure and finance projects that perpetuate environmental injustice. The activists call for public pressure on insurers and financiers to address this hypocrisy and reconsider their role in supporting environmentally and socially harmful industries.
energyLNG-terminalsfossil-fuelsenvironmental-impactinsurance-industryclimate-riskpollutionClean energy investment hits new highs and shows no sign of slowing
The article discusses a significant shift in global energy investment trends, highlighting that clean energy is projected to attract nearly double the investment of fossil fuels in the coming years. Specifically, clean energy investments are expected to reach $2.15 trillion by 2025, compared to $1.15 trillion for fossil fuels. The data indicates a steady decline in fossil fuel investments over the past decade, while clean energy investments have shown a robust upward trajectory, suggesting a strong commitment to the energy transition. The International Energy Agency (IEA) data supports the notion that unless there is a drastic change in direction, clean energy investment is likely to continue growing. Despite the positive trends, the article raises concerns about the pace of investment needed to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050, which requires an average of $4.5 trillion annually. While current trends suggest that this goal may be attainable, the article notes that clean energy growth may eventually plateau, similar to patterns observed in the mid-2010s. The author emphasizes that the increasing affordability of clean energy technologies, particularly in developing economies, positions them favorably for future growth. Additionally, the modular nature of renewables and energy storage solutions makes them attractive to investors, as they can be deployed at various scales and prices to meet rising energy demands.
clean-energyinvestmentrenewable-energyfossil-fuelsenergy-transitionenergy-storagenet-zeroThe Bomb That Will Hit The US Solar Industry From The "Big Beautiful Bill" - CleanTechnica
The article from CleanTechnica critiques a Republican budget bill, labeling it a "Big Ugly Bill" that threatens the clean technology sector, particularly the solar industry. The author argues that the bill aims to undermine the progress made under President Biden by targeting electric vehicles, wind, and solar energy initiatives. The Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) warns that the legislation could lead to the loss of over 100,000 jobs in the solar and storage sectors across the U.S., with significant job losses projected in Republican-led states like Texas and Florida. The bill could also result in the closure of 331 factories and a loss of $286 billion in local investments. The article emphasizes the detrimental impact of the proposed legislation on American families and the economy, suggesting that it contradicts the notion of "Making America Great Again." It highlights the historical support of Republican politicians for fossil fuels over clean energy, indicating a lack of concern for the adverse effects on their constituents. While there is a slim possibility that some Republican lawmakers may advocate for pro-solar policies, the author expresses skepticism about any positive outcomes, suggesting that the situation is likely to worsen for the clean technology industry.
energysolar-industryclean-technologyjob-lossrenewable-energylegislationfossil-fuelsEU’s New Carbon Tax (ETS2) a €300bn Opportunity to Help Transition European Citizens Away from Fossil Fuels - CleanTechnica
energycarbon-taxgreen-infrastructureemissions-tradingelectric-mobilityfossil-fuelsclimate-policyHidden Super-Emitters: The Climate Imperative Of Addressing Abandoned Fossil Fuel Infrastructure - CleanTechnica
energyclimate-changemethane-emissionsfossil-fuelsenvironmental-impactemissions-reductionregulatory-frameworksIdeology Accidentally Aligns with Reality: US $3.7B CCS Cancellation Explained - CleanTechnica
energycarbon-capturehydrogen-fuelsdecarbonizationfossil-fuelsclean-energyCCSWoman Sues Oil Companies For Causing Her Mother's Death - CleanTechnica
energyclimate-changefossil-fuelsoil-companieslawsuitenvironmental-impactheat-domeBonanza Of Gas Killing Geothermal Energy Discovered In US
geothermal-energyrenewable-energyenhanced-geothermal-systemsenergy-generationUS-Department-of-EnergyNevada-geothermalfossil-fuelsThe Basics of IRA Subsidies and Why It’s Stupid to Kill Them - CleanTechnica
energyelectric-vehiclessolar-powersubsidiesInflation-Reduction-Actclean-technologyfossil-fuelsRepublican Bill in Congress Threatens 300 US Factories, 300,000 American Jobs - CleanTechnica
energysolar-energyrenewable-energyenergy-infrastructureclean-energyfossil-fuelsjob-lossE-Bikes & E-Scooters on New Utah Trail Will Eliminate Fossil-Fuel-Burning Car Trips - CleanTechnica
energye-bikese-scootersfossil-fuelssustainable-transportationrecreationUtahClean Energy Shifts China’s CO₂ Emissions From Growth To Decline
clean-energyCO₂-emissionsrenewable-energyelectric-vehiclesChinaenergy-transitionfossil-fuelsA New Job For Wave Energy: Water Desalination
wave-energydesalinationrenewable-energyoffshore-technologyenergy-efficiencyclean-waterfossil-fuelsAviation Professionals Call For A New Flight Plan On Emissions
energyemissionsaviationclimate-changesustainable-aviation-fuelscarbon-footprintfossil-fuelsTony Blair’s New Climate Reset Report Promotes Delay, Not Action
energyclimate-changefossil-fuelsclimate-policytechnology-solutionssustainabilityenvironmental-impactTrump Attacks on Loan Program that Sustained Tesla, EV Charging Program, Fuel Economy Standards — What Next?
energyelectric-vehiclesclean-technologyrenewable-energyfossil-fuelsbattery-productionEV-chargingNew Data On Fossil Fuel Industry Emissions Could Play Pivotal Role In Climate Litigation
energyclimate-changefossil-fuelsemissionscarbon-footprintsustainabilityclimate-litigationGreasing the Wheels of the Energy Transition to Address Climate Change & Fossil Fuels Phaseout
energyclimate-changerenewable-energyenergy-transitionfossil-fuelselectrificationenergy-models