Articles tagged with "pollution"
Despite Protests, Elon Musk Secures Air Permit for xAI
Elon Musk’s xAI data center in Memphis has been granted an air permit by the Shelby County Health Department to continue operating its gas turbines, which power the company’s Grok chatbot. This permit was issued despite significant community opposition and an impending lawsuit alleging violations of the Clean Air Act. The xAI facility, located in the predominantly Black Boxtown neighborhood—a historically pollution-burdened area—uses mobile gas turbines that emit harmful pollutants like nitrogen oxides. Residents and local leaders, including State Rep. Justin Pearson, have raised concerns about the public health impact of these emissions, describing the situation as a public health emergency. xAI began operating the turbines before obtaining the necessary permits, leading to legal challenges from the NAACP and the Southern Environmental Law Center (SELC), which argue that the company violated environmental regulations by failing to secure permits and allowing unchecked pollution. The newly issued permit allows xAI to operate 15 turbines until 2027, though reports and aerial footage suggest the company
energygas-turbinesair-permitpollutionclean-air-actsupercomputeremissionsAir quality tests around xAI’s Memphis data center raise questions
Elon Musk’s xAI data center in Memphis, powered by natural gas turbines, has sparked concerns among local residents about potential air pollution. In response, the City of Memphis conducted air quality tests at three locations near the facility—downtown Memphis, Whitehaven, and Boxtown—on June 13 and 16. The results, released by the city, indicated that levels of the ten pollutants tested were not dangerous. However, the Southern Environmental Law Center (SELC), representing the NAACP, criticized the testing for omitting ozone (smog), a significant pollutant, and for methodological issues such as placing monitors directly against buildings, which could affect accuracy. The testing was limited in scope and duration, with sampling equipment running for 10 to 13 hours on days when wind patterns were unlikely to carry pollutants from the data center to the test sites. Formaldehyde was detected downtown but remained within urban norms. The SELC's concerns highlight potential gaps in the testing approach, particularly
energydata-centernatural-gas-turbinesair-qualitypollutionenvironmental-monitoringozoneInsurance Companies Cancelling Home Owner Insurance Are Supporting LNG Terminals - CleanTechnica
The article highlights a stark contradiction in the behavior of major insurance companies in the United States. While these insurers are increasingly canceling homeowner insurance policies in many areas due to climate-related risks, they continue to provide coverage for liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminals, particularly in regions like the Gulf Coast from Port Arthur, Texas, to Lake Charles, Louisiana. These areas, predominantly inhabited by Black, Brown, and low-income communities, have become "sacrifice zones"—highly polluted and environmentally degraded regions where marginalized populations disproportionately suffer health and environmental harms. The insurance companies, motivated by substantial profits from LNG projects, are criticized for ignoring the ethical implications of supporting fossil fuel infrastructure that exacerbates climate change and environmental racism. The article draws on data from the Rainforest Action Network, which identifies insurers such as Chubb, AIG, Allianz, Liberty Mutual, Munich Re, Swiss Re, Zurich, Tokio Marine, and The Hartford as key backers of LNG projects like Cameron LNG. Additionally, major financial institutions including JPMorgan, Citi, BlackRock, and Vanguard have funded these fossil fuel expansions. Community organizers and activists, such as Roishetta Ozane from Lake Charles, emphasize the direct health impacts on local residents and link these to broader climate crises driven by fossil fuel emissions. They argue that while insurance companies refuse to cover vulnerable homeowners facing climate threats, they paradoxically insure and finance projects that perpetuate environmental injustice. The activists call for public pressure on insurers and financiers to address this hypocrisy and reconsider their role in supporting environmentally and socially harmful industries.
energyLNG-terminalsfossil-fuelsenvironmental-impactinsurance-industryclimate-riskpollutionAnother Electric Vehicle Benefit: No Motor Oil Leaks - CleanTechnica
energyelectric-vehiclespollutionmotor-oilenvironmental-impacttransmission-fluidclean-technologyLiving tattoos for buildings might turn urban walls into air purifiers
materialsenergypollutioncarbon-capturesustainable-architecturebioactive-surfacesurban-innovation